Skip to content

Conversation

clubby789
Copy link
Contributor

As best I can tell, this was stabilized for Edition 2021 in #88126 but the feature was never removed.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 28, 2023

r? @Nilstrieb

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 28, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

I don't think we ever plan on enabling this for editions < 2021, and only nightly(or bootstrap) users are able to use it anyways. Therefore I think this is totally fine to remove.

I don't think this needs an FCP or anything, since the feature was already stabilized for edition 2021+, but cc @rust-lang/lang for good measure. This is a small PR and can be reverted just in case I'm totally misunderstanding the process here.

r? @compiler-errors @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 28, 2023

📌 Commit f83ce99 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rustbot rustbot assigned compiler-errors and unassigned Noratrieb Feb 28, 2023
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 28, 2023
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
…ler-errors

Remove the `capture_disjoint_fields` feature

As best I can tell, this was stabilized for Edition 2021 in rust-lang#88126 but the feature was never removed.
@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

This makes perfect sense to me, @compiler-errors 👍

And in general I'd say compiler's always allowed to remove nightly-only stuff it deems not useful enough to keep maintaining.

Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
…ler-errors

Remove the `capture_disjoint_fields` feature

As best I can tell, this was stabilized for Edition 2021 in rust-lang#88126 but the feature was never removed.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
…ler-errors

Remove the `capture_disjoint_fields` feature

As best I can tell, this was stabilized for Edition 2021 in rust-lang#88126 but the feature was never removed.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#108297 (Exit when there are unmatched delims to avoid noisy diagnostics)
 - rust-lang#108531 (rustdoc: Show that repeated expression arrays can be made with constant values)
 - rust-lang#108536 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#108550 (Remove the `capture_disjoint_fields` feature)
 - rust-lang#108551 (Descriptive error when users try to combine RPITIT/AFIT with specialization)
 - rust-lang#108554 (Only look for param in item's generics if it actually comes from generics)
 - rust-lang#108555 (Fix a race in the query system)
 - rust-lang#108558 (add missing feature in core/tests)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 78f9bb1 into rust-lang:master Mar 1, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Mar 1, 2023
@jackh726 jackh726 mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants